又亮 （好害羞）又热，后来热的不得了Richard 才去找另一间 
。可惜没脱。他也已经开始有小腹了。
按摩背部脚部完了转过身后，他只是大致上按一按脚及大腿，就帮我按摩 jj 了。因为我自己前一晚才打了飞机，他帮我揉了很久我都没有太大的反应，他只好出杀手锏 - 用手指插我肛门 。那时我反应才来了
，他就顺势帮我越打越大力，终于才射了。哈哈！他还很调皮的说有些人不 fuck 是不能射的，然后问我是不是这样，害我不知道怎样回答他。 然后他又说我肛门还蛮紧，问我是不是很久没有 fuck 了，有够力八卦的咯他！ 他说他曾经有一个马来客人甚至叫他 fisting，他拳头及手腕都进去了，他一脸洋洋得意地说很脏，受不了他！
除非没有选择，然后会试试 body2body 因为想看看和摸摸他的 jj 
。
我对书本和影音光碟没有多大的免疫力。
茨厂街大众书局中文部已决定搬迁至Jalan Hang Lekir 的英文部那儿，现在正举行搬迁大折扣，相当多书都抛出70-80%的价钱。对我这些没有免疫力的人是致命的伤害。
上个星期已和老姐拜访了一趟，扫了6本书总共损伤RM58。昨天下午又和另一个朋友再走一趟，又再次损伤RM58。荷包顿时清减了许多，换来的是午后及睡前的精神进食。
大众书局后跟朋友提起Hartamas的“彩虹商店”，他只听说所以想去拜访，所以我们又风尘仆仆的驾车前去。就这样，我又买了近RM60的同志题材电影光碟。再看看他们有没有性玩具可以买（嘻嘻），虽说他们选择少存货不多又不打算再补货，但我之前买了的超大dildo不太用得着，所以我又以RM90的价钱买了一个普通尺码的dildo。幸好他们没有我一直在找的anaeros，我的荷包才没有再大出血。
总之，在去柬埔寨之前呢，我都不该和不能再败家了！切记切忌！
唉...
+ 
Queer cinema. Queer cinema has been in existence for decades although it lacked a label. Films of Jean Cocteau and Jean Genet in France in the 1930s and 1950s (such as Le Sang d'un poète, Jean Cocteau, 1934, and Le Chant d’amour, Jean Genet, 1950) are cited as the forefathers (sic). It is a cinema that is identified with avant-garde or underground movements (for example Kenneth Anger’s and Andy Warhol’s 1960s films in the USA). In the avant-garde world of cinema, lesbian film-makers' presence is quite strong too (for example Ulrike Ottinger, Chantal Akerman, Pratibha Parmar). Although we could go on listing names for this heritage of Queer cinema, another of the greats has to be Rainer Werner Fassbinder (working in the 1970s and early 1980s) - even in his seemingly mainstream (European art) films he was taking genres to task and re-interpreting them through a gay and queer sensibility (see: Fear eats the Soul, 1974; The Marriage of Maria Braun, 1979). And it is fitting perhaps that his last film, Querelle (1982) - based on Genet's 1947 novel - is fully about gay and queer desire. And, finally on this list, what could be queerer and braver than the Brazilian film-maker Hector Babenco's 1985 film The Kiss of the Spiderwoman in which the macho arch-revolutionary succumbs to the charms of the flamboyant queen in his prison cell?
Queer cinema itself was introduced as a concept in 1991 at the Toronto Festival of Festivals, to refer to a spate of films (beginning in the late 1980s) that re-examined and reviewed histories of the image of gays. These films proposed renegotiated subjectivities, men looking at men, gazes exchanged, and so on. They also took over genres previously considered mainstream, subverting them by bringing the question of pleasure on to the screen and the celebration of excess. In certain cases these films reinscribed the homosexual text where previously it had been elided. See, for example, Derek Jarman’s historical film Edward II, (1991), or Tom Kalin’s murder/crime thriller Swoon (1992) (the latter is a ‘remake or retake’, setting the record straight (!) of two earlier versions of the true story of a murder committed by two young men of a 14-year-old boy in Chicago in 1924. The first version was the Alfred Hitchcock film, Rope (1948), and the second a Richard Fleischer film, Compulsion (1959). Both films completely elide the homosexual dimension to the two killers’ relationship.
not an identifiable movement. One of the leaders of the Amercian queer cinema is Gus Van Sant (My Own Private Idaho, 1991; Even Cowgirls Get the Blues, 1993). New Queer Cinema was a term coined in a 1992 Village Voice article by B. Ruby Rich to describe the renaissance in gay and lesbian film-making represented by the Americans Todd Haynes, Jennie Livingstone, Gus Van Sant, Gregg Araki, Laurie Lynd, Tom Kalin and the British film-makers Derek Jarman and Isaac Julien. Queer cinema is not a single aesthetic but a collection of different aesthetics – what Rich delightfully refers to as ‘Homo-Pomo’. It is a cinema that takes pride in difference. Queer cinema is above all a male homosexual cinema and focuses on the construction of male desire. Some lesbian film-makers have made films that come under this label and it is instructive that they have made films that address not just their sexuality (as in Go Fish!, Rose Troche, 1994) but that of their male counterparts (Paris is Burning, Jennie Livingstone, 1991).
opposed to gay film-makers. Gay is perhaps more cool than lesbian at present, and one does wonder - cynically perhaps - if Philadelphia (Demme, 1993) would ever have been financed by Hollywood if the New Queer Cinema had not come along at the beginning of the 1990s and enjoyed the success it did with mainstream as well as gay audiences. Having said that , there are some lesbian feature films, although for the most part, they pre-date New Queer Cinema - an exception being Patricia Rozema's beguiling When Night is Falling (1995). Of the 1980s' films we can count Born in Flames, Lizzie Borden, 1983, Desert Hearts, Donna Deitch, 1985, I've Heard the Mermaids Singing, Patricia Rozema, 1987. Due to lack of financing, most lesbian film-makers have opted for video to develop their counter-cinema in an unfettered way much as other marginal cinemas before them have done - such as women's cinema, and cinema nôvo as it developed into garbage cinema (see Sadie Benning, Jollies, 1990, Pratibha Parmar, Khush, 1991, Shu Lea Cheang, Fresh Kill, 1994).
royal send-ups in The Adventure of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert, Stephan Elliott (1994) and in Go Fish! Queer Cinema challenges the view that homosexuality and lesbianism must have value ascribed to it (as good or bad) - it just is. There are political implications about homosexuality and lesbianism, but so too are there about race - as indeed black gay and lesbian film-makers make clear (Looking for Langston, Isaac Julien, 1988). In Queer cinema and theory, the gaze as well as questions of visual pleasure come under scrutiny. Since the relays of looking are different within the screen, so too must they be outside the xcreen and in the spectator's eyes. More pleasures can be experienced by the spectator as he or she adopts different positionalities within the narrative. In some ways this is not so new if we think of pornography and the pleasure in viewing for the spectator (male of female) of the typical tried aset-up which includes a lesbian scene or two to get things warmed/hotted up. But it may be that Queer theory makes us feel more comfortable speaking about it. Interestingly pornography as a critical debate within film studies has only truly emerged in the 1990s - perhaps coming on the heels of the effects of Queer theory.
difficult it is to be clear on this. However, I would argue that this crossover is more a case of queerness being a recognized state-of-being amongst others. In 1998-9 alone, there were six very ostensibly queer films (at the very least), two of which were made by women and all of which were box-office successes: Being John Malkovich (Jonze, 1999), Boys Don't Cry (Pierce, 1999), Gods and Monsters (Condon, 1999), High Art (Cholodenko, 1998), Love is the Devil (Study for a Portrait of Francis Bacon) (Maybury, 1998), The Talented Mr Ripley (Minghella, 1999). None of these films gloss over on what it means to have a queer identity, nor indeed the difficulties this can represent in terms of social acceptability. Only the first film has a light outcome with a lesbian relationship asserting itself after a series of fun-filled adventures entering into the mind and eye's view of John Malkovich. Gods and Monsters' study of the career of the gay film-maker James Whale (he directed the 1930s Frankenstein movies) gives us a sense of what it was like to be queer in Hollywood at a time when hetero-normativity was very big. The other four films, it has to be said, however, are quite dark, either because death is the outcome of the intolerance of others (Boys Don't Cry; The Talented Mr Ripley), or because they unflinchingly show the harder side of lesbian and gay society (High Art; Love is the Devil).
Queer Cinema advocates multiplicity: of voices and of sexualities. Multiplicity in a generic sense also: vampire films and comedy. thrillers and musicals. Unstick the queer from the moribund representation to which much of mainstream cinema has confined 'it'. Queers are neither the depressed anomics nor the serial killers some film-makers would have us believe (see Winterbottom's offensive Butterfly Kiss, 1994). To rewrite Foucault: 'Queer is everywhere'. The signs of queer globalization are there to see. Almodovar's work is an obvious first citation in terms of Europe. But Asian queer is also on the scene (Chen Kaige's Farewell My Concubine, 1993, Zhang Yuan's East Palace/West Palace, 1996, Wong Kar-Wai's Happy Together, 1997). It is no longer a case of having to find it, but 'to connect'.
Posts
All Comments
